Taking a look at ten different PHP frameworks
(Page 3 out of 4)WACT - Web Application Toolkit
WACT looks quite promising, and it has the basic things a framework needs, like MVC, database objects and a template engine, but that's about it. It doesn't have any extra modules, and it definitely lacks a few inbuilt things, like Ajax, caching, an authentication module and more.
WACT does have one of the best template engines though, and it even allows you to create your own template tags to add certain functionality.
Prado
Prado is a very unique framework, and it offers some really cool features. It doesn't come with inbuilt support for MVC (from what I can tell), but it does have all kinds of components to handle most of the usual PHP tasks, and what's even neater it that it makes event-driven scripts possible. For example, it's possible to set an onClick event on a HTML button that links to a PHP function. This closely resembles ASP.NET, and Prado contains more ASP.NET components, like a GridView and a Repeater Control.
By looking at the comparison chart it might seem that Prado is a bit weak compared to the others, but this isn't true. Because Prado is so unique, it doesn't score a lot of points on the chart, but in reality it is very powerful.
PHP on Trax
This framework seems to be a PHP port of Ruby and Rails, and used to be called PHP on Rails. Unfortunately documentation is quite sparse, so it's hard to determine what this framework offers, but its documentation does mention ActiveRecord, so it probably offers ActiveRecord, just like RoR. Another thing it includes is inbuilt support for Ajax, and the two demos that can be found on the website clearly show this.
PHP on Trax is on the right way, but it's still missing a few things, like an authentication module and a caching module. It doesn't have any extra modules either, so it's all a bit basic at the moment.
ZooP Framework
The ZooP Framework is really feature-packed, and as the chart clearly shows, it supports almost anything, except for an inbuilt caching module and an ORM. What's even more surprising is that it runs on PHP4, which is really exceptional considering all the functionality it offers.
Another thing ZooP offers is inbuilt GUI controls, making it very easy to create forms quickly. It supports most of the basic form elements, and that advantage of using GUI controls over regular HTML is that you can tightly integrate validation logic with the GUI controls.
March 20th, 2006 at 1:44 pm
Cool article :) , this article gives me lot of information about current PHP Frameworks :D .
Thanks
March 20th, 2006 at 3:50 pm
[…] read more | digg story […]
March 20th, 2006 at 3:57 pm
According to the chart I would simply choose Seagull. I might even use it in my next project and wait until Zend’s incredible machine becomes more mature.
March 20th, 2006 at 4:28 pm
Just a heads up: The latest release of CakePHP (0.10 Final) has support for caching and every release has had templates (it is an MVC framework after all).
March 20th, 2006 at 4:30 pm
oh… and ORM too. The model/controller is based on the ActiveRecord pattern.
March 20th, 2006 at 4:47 pm
Very useful (at least for me) once my php got a bit more complicated.
March 20th, 2006 at 4:48 pm
CakePHP has released a final version (0.10) of its framework today!
March 20th, 2006 at 4:51 pm
Your review of Symfony is incorrect, it has a templating system built in as well as modules! Please do your research!
March 20th, 2006 at 4:51 pm
I should note that Symfony also allows for alternate templating systems, like Smarty.
March 20th, 2006 at 4:56 pm
What is a PHP framework?
Steve
http://www.networking-forum.com
March 20th, 2006 at 5:01 pm
[…] PHPit.net: Taking a look at ten different PHP frameworks: From PHPit.net, there’s this article posted that takes a look at ten of the more prominent PHP frameworks offered today, including the Zend Framework, Cake, Symfony, and Seagull. They compare each of them, including a large chart outlining their basic setup and features. […]
March 20th, 2006 at 5:06 pm
[…] PHP Frame Works […]
March 20th, 2006 at 5:32 pm
[…] read more | digg story No Tags Bookmark this to: […]
March 20th, 2006 at 5:32 pm
Just FYI Prado supports caching
March 20th, 2006 at 5:50 pm
There is a small mistake in the chart: CakePHP has built-in caching in the current version (0.10).
March 20th, 2006 at 5:52 pm
The seagull framework supports ORM for RAD, so it should be marked on your chart.
Other than that, excellent chart.
March 20th, 2006 at 5:59 pm
You did not even mention qcodo. I have tested them all and I believe qcodo is the best. http://qcodo.com Check out the demos. It is the most complete and up to date framework.
March 20th, 2006 at 6:02 pm
Hello,
CakePHP has ActiveRecord. It says so on the first line of the website under “What is CakePHP?”. (http://www.cakephp.org/)
It also has templating. Under “Key Features”, again on the front page, “fast, flexible templating (PHP syntax with helper methods)” (http://www.cakephp.org/)
The latest release has caching - again read their website. (http://cakeforge.org/frs/shownotes.php?release_id=73)
Not sure what you mean by modules, but I think components, plugins and helpers are pretty much the same thing.
I think that means Cake ticks all the right boxes - take a look and see if you agree with me.
Regards,
Andrew
March 20th, 2006 at 6:03 pm
Yesterday, the first stable version of CakePHP has been released.
March 20th, 2006 at 6:07 pm
Comparison of ten PHP frameworks
Dennis Pallett compares in an article ten popular PHP frameworks. He writes about CakePHP:
CakePHP is mostly an advanced MVC framework, with a few extra modules added on top. It can handle most of the database stuff for you, and it includes support fo…
March 20th, 2006 at 6:08 pm
I prefer Mojavi….
http://www.mojavi.org/
March 20th, 2006 at 6:08 pm
[…] Frameworks. In der PHP Szene ist dieser Begriff schon fast so nervig wie das Wort „Enterprise“. Dennoch ein interessantes Thema. PHPit vergleicht 10 verschiedene PHP frameworks. […]
March 20th, 2006 at 6:14 pm
You forgot CakePHP !
March 20th, 2006 at 6:37 pm
It would be nice to know what a framework is. Just one sentance would have been nice.
March 20th, 2006 at 7:09 pm
[…] PHPit - Totally PHP » Taking a look at ten different PHP frameworks Filed under: Programming, Articles, Web Development […]
March 20th, 2006 at 7:10 pm
In your chart, it show CakePHP with no Object Relational Mapping. This is not the case:
[From cakephp.org]
“Cake is a rapid development framework for PHP which uses commonly known design patterns like ActiveRecord, Association Data Mapping…”
March 20th, 2006 at 7:14 pm
Also, CakePHP has recently released 0.10 Final, which does support both page caching and query caching.
March 20th, 2006 at 7:21 pm
Why wasn’t agavi covered? Agavi is more complete in many respects than the frameworks listed above. Agavi along with propel/creole provides a ‘check’ for all of the features listed above.
March 20th, 2006 at 7:28 pm
[…] Taking a look at ten different PHP frameworks […]
March 20th, 2006 at 7:42 pm
Zoop Framework and Seagull seem to be the most full featured on this list, both having 10 of 12 checks.
The upcoming Zoop Framework 1.2 adds caching support and is slated to be released April 2006.
They are also the most mature frameworks on the list.
March 20th, 2006 at 7:45 pm
Drupal would have green checkboxes all the way across, except for ORM.
March 20th, 2006 at 7:54 pm
With all due respect, this article is all but worthless. Where are the feature comparisons? Where is the benchmark and performance data? What are the fundamental differences/strengths/weaknesses of each one? How does each framework stack up when performing the most common web development tasks? Etc…
March 20th, 2006 at 7:55 pm
PHP framework comparison chart
"Framework" seems to be the PHP buzzword of 2006. Choosing the right framework for your project is an involved task, but you can refer to this handy "at a glance" PHP framework comparison chart from PHPit.net to get you going in th…
March 20th, 2006 at 8:19 pm
Comparativa de los 10 mejores frameworks de PHP
Una comparativa muy útil a la hora de decidir cuál framework de PHP utilizar en nuestros proyectos.
Lastima que de esa comparativa ninguna tiene todas las características, que opinais? habeis usado alguno de estos?
March 20th, 2006 at 8:27 pm
[…] read more | digg story […]
March 20th, 2006 at 8:57 pm
I think this is a deceptive chart. I’ve used Symfony and Seagull and they are very different in fundamental ways and comparing them this way is misleading. I think that Symfony is a much better framework, but the chart would make you believe they are on par. (For the record Symfony has templating and modules.) I haven’t tried cakephp, but of the other top contenders Symfony is the best and most forward-thinking product–you can create really powerful web 2.0 apps with it very quickly. I love it!
March 20th, 2006 at 9:15 pm
Nice comparison, but how is ‘popular’ measured?
My only concern here is the apples vs. oranges comparison. There are frameworks in the list that aren’t frameworks but component libraries. If you list ez components and zend framework, you might as well list PEAR, which is no less a framework than some of the others are, but very popular nevertheless.
March 20th, 2006 at 9:22 pm
[…] phpit.net/article/ten-different-php-frameworks/ […]
March 20th, 2006 at 9:30 pm
Nice comparison chart. Just see PHP on TRAX for the first time and thinking of renaming our own framework to something like “PHP on Crack” or “PHP on Steroid” to be catchy :)
March 20th, 2006 at 9:35 pm
This is some pretty good information.
I have a question:
I am an IT guy, Systems Admin. Looking to work on some serious web projects. If I am somewhat new to programming/web development (besides pure html), which way would you recommend, a PHP Framework, or Ruby on Rails? From the point of view of someone starting from scratch. If a PHP framework, then which one?
Thanks a lot to anyone who answers this.
-Steve
March 20th, 2006 at 9:45 pm
This article is useless. We need performance comparisons, reviews of the documentation, strengths and weaknesses, and descriptions of how well these claimed features are implemented.
March 20th, 2006 at 9:50 pm
Correction: CodeIgniter does support multiple databases…
March 20th, 2006 at 10:49 pm
[…] A look at ten popular frameworks, and compare them to each other. […]
March 20th, 2006 at 10:55 pm
Thanks for the heads-up on CakePHP’s caching. I changed the chart. As for the templates; I’m looking for more than just regular views, and there should be a seperate template engine of some sorts that allows tags or something similar. Unless CakePHP also supports this?
App: I took another look, but couldn’t find a real template engine in Symfony, and only found regular PHP-based views. I couldn’t find anything about Smarty integration either. Could you point me to the right docs? Thanks.
Jason Ragsdale: you’re right, and I missed it. My bad, and thanks for letting me know. I’ve changed the chart.
Plezops: I just checked, and you’re right. I’ve fixed the chart, thanks for letting me know.
Andrew: you’re right about the ORM, and I’ve updated the chart. As for the templating, I don’t think Cake qualifies, as I’m looking for more than just PHP-based views. I’m actually looking for a powerful template engine, like Smarty, Savant, etc. Or custom solutions like Prado and ZooP.
Thanks for all the great comments everyone, and if you notice anymore wrong information let me know. Also, I’ll try to keep the chart up-to-date as much as possible.
March 20th, 2006 at 11:32 pm
The chart doesn’t really do something like the Zend Framework justice. It is unique in that you have much more freedom in how you want to arrange your application. It focuses on simplicity of implementation more than the others and lets you use bits and pieces where you want to. The other frameworks lock you in to a relativley rigid application structure and naming convention. The downside to it is that it requires more advanced PHP skills to utilize effectively (an upside, really, for more advanced developers).
March 21st, 2006 at 12:11 am
Leave PHP.
RubyOnRails.
March 21st, 2006 at 12:27 am
[…] dino @ 11:21 pm Auf der Seite von PHPit.net [1] findet sich eine kurze Zusammenfassung �ber die wichtigsten PHPFrameworks, die sich derzeit auf dem Markt befinden. Mit darunter ist z.B. Das Zend Framework [2], das Symfony Projekt [3] oder eZ Components [4]. Auf einer kurzen �bersicht kann man die Eigenschaften der einzelnen Frameworks sehr gut �berschauen. Was sehr interessant aussieht und eine Portierung von Ruby on Rails auf PHP versucht ist das Projekt PHP on Trax [5]. […]
March 21st, 2006 at 12:29 am
[…] PHPit - Totally PHP » Taking a look at ten different PHP frameworks (tags: read+later PHP) […]
March 21st, 2006 at 12:44 am
[…] A quick overview of ten popular PHP Frameworks. […]
March 21st, 2006 at 1:46 am
I don’t think Cake has a real template engine either. But who cares, I prefer PHP native style view, muhahaha.
Now I should consider about Cake’s rich features to enrich my own now :)
March 21st, 2006 at 3:09 am
[…] Taking a look at ten different PHP frameworks (tags: php) […]
March 21st, 2006 at 5:12 am
[…] Daniel Pallet publicou um artigo comparando 10 frameworks PHP, ele resume as características em uma tabela e faz comentários sobre cada um deles. […]
March 21st, 2006 at 5:15 am
KinG? Do you know QQ group?
Ha~~~,we have released our new project named KISSPHP to sf….,
if you are keeping on find a way to write less code to achive more complex web applications,U’d better try our kissphp=>Keep It Simple Style in Php,you’ll love it it!
March 21st, 2006 at 5:28 am
CakePHP could have all the checks in the above chart.
Our framework allows you to extend the view, doing this you can use any template system you want in Cake.
I wrote this class a while ago to give people an idea how to extend it, this is the SmartyView.
http://cakeforge.org/snippet/detail.php?type=snippet&id=6
And we have helpers and components (modules) that ship with the core, many more are found on CakeForge site.
March 21st, 2006 at 6:36 am
Where is SolarPHP? http://www.solarphp.com
March 21st, 2006 at 8:28 am
[…] Taking a look at ten different PHP frameworks, read PHP MVC Frameworks before. Posted by udhien.net | […]
March 21st, 2006 at 8:50 am
[…] Вспоминая Zend и их, пока полный провал с выходом их Zend Framework, отмечу сравнительную статью 10 php framework. Кто-то не поленился сравнить 10 разных php framework, подняв немалую дисскусию по этой теме. Zend Framework я так ещё и не посмотрел, зато в LiveJournal.com начитался критики от адекватных людей. PHP, Web — Сергей Куракин @ 09:19 Комментариев по теме нет » […]
March 21st, 2006 at 9:57 am
[…] 这是一个连接。介绍了流行的php架构。 […]
March 21st, 2006 at 10:32 am
eZ components:
* upcoming v1.1 will ship with templates, RSS/Atom, DatabaseSchema, etc.
Roadmap: http://ez.no/community/developer/roadmap/ez_components
EBNF of templates component: http://zev.ez.no/filedetails.php?repname=ezcomponents&path=/trunk/Template/design/EBNF.txt&rev=0&sc=0
* future plans might include MVC, a framework component, etc.
http://ez.no/community/articles/interview_the_future_of_ez_development/ez_components
* the reasoning, why they don’t try to be a fit-all framework: http://ez.no/community/forum/developer/php_framework/re_php_framework__5
March 21st, 2006 at 10:32 am
Zend seems to be quite decent..
March 21st, 2006 at 11:09 am
[…] Comparativa de 10 frameworks para PHP […]
March 21st, 2006 at 11:24 am
[…] PHPit - Totally PHP » Taking a look at ten different PHP frameworks (tags: php Programming reference) No Tags […]
March 21st, 2006 at 11:36 am
What about the Horde Application Framework ?
It has been around for years, and was recently released in version 3.1.
Would have been interesting to see this compared to the ones on the list. I know that there are many frameworks, and you can’t list them all. But Horde seems to be an obvious example.
And, thanks for this article!
March 21st, 2006 at 11:45 am
[…] 在 CakePHP 目前看起來還沒有很明朗的情況下，參考這篇文章決定來試試看 Seagull Framework。 […]
March 21st, 2006 at 1:00 pm
Cake doesn’t tie itself to any one templating system. That is one of its strengths.
You could in theory use any templating system. Here’s how to get CakePHP to use Smarty for example: http://wiki.cakephp.org/tutorials:cake_with_smarty?s=smarty
I get the impression you didn’t realy research any of these products. Did you just go the homepage of each one and check off their list of features against your own requirement list?
March 21st, 2006 at 3:22 pm
[…] PHPit 昨天对目前主流的PHP开发框架进行了细致的比较.原文这里阅读 […]
March 21st, 2006 at 5:00 pm
#10: Indicates whether the framework has other modules, like an RSS feed parser, PDF module or anything else (useful).
———————————————————————————————–
What do you mean by modules I’m lost, those are frameworks not CMSs you do know that, right ? you do also know that Components/Plugins/vendors are what you call Modules in framework’s terminology ? If that’s what you are refering to, then check CakePHP’s Wiki, you can integrate PDF, Rss, whatever you want..
also seagull uses pear::flexy, that’s an exterior thingy, they didn’t write flexy, now did they ?
Well, as previously mentionned, you can integrate, in theory, whatever templating engine you want in CakePHP.
March 21st, 2006 at 5:13 pm
I didn’t just have a look at the homepage, but actually did some thorough research, and tried to be as accurate as possible. While it’s true that I didn’t test each framework individually, I did:
- download each framework, and installed it
- look through the documentation for its functionality
- look through the source to check for any missing features
- check out the demo’s
- do some Google searches to find any more information.
I made a few mistakes here and there, but in general it’s a fair comparison, and the chart is quite accurate.
Oth: by “other modules” I mean extra functionality that isn’t listed in the chart, like handling PDF’s (Zend), Feed components, web services, Json, etc.
March 21st, 2006 at 5:33 pm
[…] If you’re wondering which PHP framework will work for you or you’re getting headache by just thinking about them you should take a look on this article. There is also quick overview of 10 most popular frameworks here. I personally like Symfony. […]
March 22nd, 2006 at 12:30 am
[…] There is a nice list of 10 frameworks and brief reviews. All of them support PHP 5, and a handful have PHP 4 support. They have features ranging from AJAX engines to caching, it’s quite the list. Check it out here. […]
March 22nd, 2006 at 12:08 pm
Dennis,
What you’re calling ‘modules’, symfony calls ‘plugins’ - and they just so happen to have a PDF and Feed plugin. See http://www.symfony-project.com/trac/browser/plugins
Paul
March 22nd, 2006 at 3:24 pm
[…] This article at phpit.net has a great chart comparing the features of the top 10 PHP frameworks. You know what to do […]
March 22nd, 2006 at 4:35 pm
[…] Link php, framework | Bookmark on del.icio.us • • • […]
March 22nd, 2006 at 6:23 pm
Contrary to the review, Symfony allows “Modules” (in Symfony they are called “Plugins”). There are several early implementations of plugins available for symfony that include image manipulation, graphing and PDF generation.
Symfony also has allows provides instructions to use the Smarty Template system instead of traditional PHP pages as templates.
March 22nd, 2006 at 6:26 pm
[…] 10 Frameworks im Vergleich: Taking a look at ten different PHP frameworks. Mit dabei u.a. Zend Framework, Prado und CakePHP. […]
March 22nd, 2006 at 8:13 pm
I see a number of factual errors in your post regarding the frameworks, some of which are listed on the front pages or tech pages of the projects your reviewing.
Also, I don’t see this as a material comparison of these frameworks. Unfortunately, many of them take a radically different approach from one another, so this kind of comparison is Apples to Oranges. You might consider adding http://www.qcodo.com/ as well.
It’s nice to see someone trying!
March 23rd, 2006 at 2:26 am
[…] Full article here. […]
March 23rd, 2006 at 3:57 am
[…] PHPit - Totally PHP » Taking a look at ten different PHP frameworks (tags: php framework) No Tags […]
March 23rd, 2006 at 8:07 am
[…] PHPit - Totally PHP » Taking a look at ten different PHP frameworks (tags: php framework) […]
March 23rd, 2006 at 3:02 pm
It’s a bit sad to see that the Yellow Duck Framework is missing from the list. It has the features that are listed in the table:
- PHP4: YES
- PHP5: YES
- MVC: no
- Multiple DB’s: YES (supports MySQL, Oracle, PostgreSQL and SQLite)
- ORM: YES (YDDatabaseObject)
- DB Objects: YES (YDDatabaseObject)
- Templates: YES (smarty)
- Caching: NO
- Validation: YES
- AJAX: YES
- Auth Module: YES
- Modules: lots, like YDGraph, YDPdf, YDCart, YDFeedCreator, YDInstaller, YDMySQLDump
- Documentation: YES, a 300+ page user guide and full API documentation
More on: http://ydframework.berlios.de
March 23rd, 2006 at 5:40 pm
Let The Record Reflect:
I don’t know how you can say the Zend Framework has “MVC”: First of all, it’s barely a loose collection of components as it is, and for that matter, they don’t even have an “M” yet (note the decided *lack* of ActiveRecord implementation, or even an attempt at it).
Bottom line: Don’t expect much. I guess they don’t realize it yet, but they can’t have it both ways. It’s a shame that Zend has bought this far into their own hype, I can only hope that no one else does.
As for the claims that it’s more efficient for “advanced” developers, I categorically disagree. Having written software for the last 12 years, I can tell you that there’s nothing about it that makes it any more efficient than your run-of-the-mill component library. They make you do all the structure yourself.
Seagull: I don’t know why people keep confusing Seagull for a web development framework. Seagull is *at best* a bloated groupware application with something of an API.
CakePHP: As others have said, CakePHP checks every box on the list and then some. The View tier is completely extensible, and classes have already been written to integrate it with Smartys. Not that the idea that templates can’t use native PHP isn’t patently ridiculous. Not only that, but no modules? Cakeforge.org is an entire site completely devoted to applications and “modules” that extend CakePHP.
Symfony: It’s not a *bad* framework, but neither is it very efficient. Low signal-to-noise ratio.
PHP on Trax: Not too bad. Not as many features as the others, but very lightweight and not a bad place to start if on PHP5.
Prado: Are you kidding me? I might as well use .NET
In summary, I think the review as a whole is far too simplistic, and while I believe the effort in and of itself should be appreciated (and maybe this could be a springboard for a more in-depth review), the fact that the initial publication of the article didn’t even include a check indicating that CakePHP supported ORM, when that is one of the key features (as stated right on the home page), only serves to underscore the lack of research and review time which was put into it.
March 23rd, 2006 at 5:48 pm
[…] PHPit - Totally PHP » Taking a look at ten different PHP frameworks (tags: php framework) No Tags […]
March 23rd, 2006 at 9:18 pm
[…] ช่วงนี้เห็นในชุมชน PHP พูดถึง PHP Framework กันมาก แสดงให้เห็นว่าการเขียนเว็บแบบเดิมคงเริ่มจะหมดแล้วมาสู่ยุคเว็บแบบ OO แล้ว แต่การที่เลือกใช้ Framework ตัวไหนก็ยังเป็นเรื่องยากเหมือนกันเพราะแต่ละตัวก็มีข้อดีข้อต่างไม่เหมือนกัน ที่เห็นน่าสนใจก็มี เช่น CakePHP, Seagull Framework, Zoop Framework, PHP on TRAX และก็ของ Zend เองก็มี Zend Framework ที่ยังเป็นเบต้าอยู่ (ยังมีอีกหลายตัวลองดูได้ที่ http://www.phpwact.org/php/mvc_frameworks) โดยส่วนตัวก็ยังไม่ได้ลองพวก framework พวกนี้เลย ไว้ถ้าได้ลองแล้วจะเอามาโพสอีกทีละกัน ตอนนี้เอาตารางเปรียบเทียบไปดูละกันครับ http://phpit.net/article/ten-different-php-frameworks […]
March 24th, 2006 at 12:04 am
Hi,
I think your overview is a little incomplete. I would like to see a list of what each of these frameworks needs to work. Besides just PHP and database versions are there any more things they need? I read some use pear, but it would be nice to see how each one handles the functionality it provides.
I do agree that it is mostly personal preference. So far I have been very pleased with CakePHP, mostly cause it is a very simple install and does not require me to update any packages outside of its own.
Thanks.
March 24th, 2006 at 10:29 am
Zend Framework (http://framdwork.zend.com ) is under active development. SolarPHP (http://www.solarphp.com ) which shares same architecture seems to be more mature and ready to use than Zend. These two framework are developed by most talented developers. They should be considered at first
CakePHP and Symphony are interesting too. Good docs, good community.
PHP on Trax, where is its documentation? I think it is dead.
Prado, a product from a Chinese and ASP.net inspired version, I dont care.
Seagull, I can not differentiate it from a its own API-based application.
March 24th, 2006 at 12:11 pm
At least, one thing are missed -> PEAR - required or no?!?
As for me it’s a really first thing I’ve always checking when selecting solution for my projects. I DON’T LIKE PEAR and it’s important for me.
From the proposed list, I like CodeIgniter & still waiting for completing Zend Framework.
March 25th, 2006 at 3:41 pm
[…] ruby, rubyonrails, zoop posted in Something About Tech Trackback URL | Comment RSS Feed | Incoming links +Del.icio.us +Furl It +Spurl +Tag!RawSugar +Simpy This! +Blink It +MyWeb Post To: […]
March 25th, 2006 at 5:31 pm
[…] Nette zvyšuje v české kotlince zájem o různé PHP frameworky. Na webu PHPit vyšel článek, který jich pár srovnává. Mimochodem, už jste četli Why I Hate Frameworks? […]
March 26th, 2006 at 9:17 am
[…] Taking a look at 10 different PHP frameworks: un art�culo en que se describen brevemente y se comparan 10 diferentes frameworks para PHP. Muy interesante, sobre todo si tenemos en cuenta que no sab�a que exist�an frameworks para PHP :P […]
March 27th, 2006 at 6:16 am
[…] 1 - PHPit - Totally PHP » Taking a look at ten different PHP frameworks (tags: reference Programming php) […]
March 29th, 2006 at 8:18 pm
[…] Browsing the del.icio.us pragramming tags earlier today I came across an interesting review of some of the major PHP frameworks floating around at the moment. It should be noted though that there seems to have been some unfair omissions of CakePHP’s features in the accompanying chart and review. […]
March 30th, 2006 at 6:24 am
Please update CodeIgniter, it does currently support multiple databases: http://www.codeigniter.com/forums/viewthread/235/
1. Several other database platforms are now supported:
MySQL
MySQLi
Postgre
SQLite
ODBC (not tested)
MS SQL (not tested)
2. The active record features have been spun off into their own class, offering much more customizable queries (joins are now supported too). The active record syntax has also been simplified in many cases, and if you’re running PHP 5 you can even do method chaining.
So far I’ve tested all the platforms except MS SQL or ODBC. By the way, I’ve greatly simplified the database adapters so it’s quite easy to add new databases.
April 1st, 2006 at 5:33 pm
[…] Có một bài trên phpIt về các framework hiện tại của PHP . Thấy đọc cũng hay , quăng vô blog chơi . […]
April 1st, 2006 at 7:35 pm
[…] This quick overview of ten of the more popular PHP development frameworks should help you in choosing the right one for your next project, based on your requirements. With the emergence of new methodologies and techniques, PHP frameworks continue to grow in number and complexity. This list can narrow down your choices to a lesser number, allowing you to evaluate your candidates more effectively. […]
April 3rd, 2006 at 8:37 am
[…] PHPit publica una mini-comparativa de frameworks en PHP. El artículo no entra en muchos detalles sobre las capacidades de cada framework, pero es una buena manera de informarse de qué opciones tienes disponibles si necesitas un buen framework y no quieres pasarte a Rails :D […]
April 11th, 2006 at 6:22 pm
If you update the chart with CodeIgniter features as multiple dbs and active record, maybe a a critical hit to the final result!
Check CodeIgniter v1.3 features: http://www.codeigniter.com
April 12th, 2006 at 6:25 pm
[…] PHPit - Totally PHP » Taking a look at ten different PHP frameworks comparison of php frameworks (tags: framework php development opensource) […]
April 12th, 2006 at 10:56 pm
[…] phpIt.net ha llevado a caba un analisis de los principales frameworks disponibles para PHP. Te mostramos el resumen a continuaci�n. […]
April 13th, 2006 at 12:29 am
Just to let you know the eZ components do include a template engine… so the table is a bit false
April 13th, 2006 at 4:26 am
[…] PHPit - Totally PHP » Taking a look at ten different PHP frameworks comparison of php frameworks (tags: framework php development opensource) […]
April 14th, 2006 at 8:44 am
[…] Nesenai paskaičiau straipsnį apie 10 PHP framework’ų, tiesa straipsnis nelabai vykęs, bet apskritai paėmus šis straipsnis turi daug tiesos. Viena iš j, kad nėra framework’o kuris būtų optimalus visais glaimais panaudos atvejais. Šiuo metu įmonėj naudojam ZNF, kuris turi ir savo trukūmų. Tačiau buvo pasirinktas šis dėl tikrai vikusios sprendimo minties, tačiau su realizacija kažkiek tai sušlubuota. Viena iš pagrindinių gerų šio fraework’o pusių yra labai griežta modulinė struktūra aprašoma xml failais. Tiesa dar visai nemažai gerų žodžių teko girdėti apie CakePHP. Tiesa savo rankomis neteko čiupinėti, tačiau bandęs kolega neliko nusivylęs, tiesa šiek tiek liūdina kad nera default’inio smarty template’ų palaikymo, nors galima jį pasidaryti pačiam pasiskaičius jų forumus. Štai ką cake developeriai patys sako: […]
April 17th, 2006 at 9:32 am
[…] http://phpit.net/article/ten-different-php-frameworks/ Tags:ajax framekwork PHP Symfony […]
April 18th, 2006 at 8:22 am
[…] PHPit has a nice article comparing ten frameworks. It is not indepth, but gives you an overview of the features available in each. Each framework is distinct in its own right, so the decision to go for one is in your hands. […]
April 18th, 2006 at 8:34 am
[…] phpit.net上对十种当今最受欢迎的php框架进行了比较，打算采用php framework开发项目的朋友可以借鉴参考，看哪一种最适合你！ […]
April 23rd, 2006 at 3:07 am
PHP on Trax documentation is out of control now. PHP on Trax was for the most part a one man show until recently, so now things are moving along quite nicely. If you go to the PHP on Trax documentation page, then click on the first link there (API), you will see lots of goodies. And yes, to my knowledge, the framework is lighter and more flexible and faster to develop on, than most frameworks out there–please verify.